Everyone else sells guesses. We sell evidence.
That line is only worth anything if it survives specifics. Here is what each category of vendor genuinely does well, and the exact place each one stops.
| The question you actually run | Registries | Data vendors | Mimir |
|---|---|---|---|
| The person behind a US LLC | no filing to look up | a score, no reasons | yes, with the documents |
| Everything one person holds, across shells | no | partial, unexplained | yes, one track record |
| Every recorded debt on a building | no | headline number only | the instruments, in order |
| Why should I believe this number? | take our word | take our word | click it, read the filing |
| Hear it the day a lien lands | no | weekly at best | the day it publishes |
| Reuse the data in your own systems | restricted | restricted | yes, receipts intact |
Four categories, four different walls.
Registry and corporate-data vendors
Deep entity records where a beneficial-ownership registry exists — strong outside the United States.
US domestic companies do not file beneficial owners publicly. FinCEN’s March 2025 interim final rule exempted them, and New York’s LLC Transparency Act routes the equivalent data to a confidential state database. There is no filing to look up, so the answer cannot be reached from a registry at all.
Property-data vendors with ownership products
Broad national property coverage and, increasingly, machine-learned owner matching.
Ownership output is probabilistic and, so far, published without accuracy figures or a per-edge evidence chain. You get an answer, not a reason — which is the part a credit committee or a court asks for.
Listings and market platforms
Decades of analyst-collected listings, comps and rent data. Genuinely hard to replicate.
Built around transactions and space, not identity. No real ownership answer, no source on the field, and licence terms that often forbid reusing the data in your own systems.
AI underwriting copilots
Excellent workflow and summarisation on top of whatever data they license.
They inherit the accuracy of a substrate that publishes no accuracy. A confident summary of an uncited guess is still an uncited guess.
What Mimir is for.
We are deliberately narrow. Knowing what Mimir is not built for is the fastest way to tell whether it is built for you.
- Depth over breadth.
- New York, New Jersey and Florida, done right. We would rather own three states completely than sixty superficially — and the engine is state-agnostic, so the list grows where customers pull it.
- Evidence over scores.
- Our difference is category, not capability: the same inputs produce the same Rune ID every time, and every control link carries evidence you can independently check — rather than a number you have to take on faith.
- Ownership, not listings.
- If you need comps, lease data and availabilities, keep that vendor. We answer the question they cannot: who is actually behind this, and how do you prove it.
- Answers, not recommendations.
- We do not score leads or rank deals. Mimir supplies the record with its receipts and the judgement stays with you.
See your market.
Twenty minutes on the live terminal.