Data you can trust. Not data you have to.
Click any number on any screen and see exactly where it came from: the office, the document, the date. When the committee pushes back, you push back harder.
Click any value, get the document
Most vendors give you one source list for the whole report. Mimir puts the source on the number itself: click it, see which record produced it. Only the second survives a credit committee, a securitization reviewer, or opposing counsel.
- 100% of 21.4M owner records name the document behind them
- Inferred links carry a confidence score in addition to their evidence
- Derived values are labelled derived, never disguised as filings
- Owner of recordVANDERPOOL HOLDINGS LLCDeed recorded 2019-04-11nyc_acris
- Controlled byHARROW STREET CAPITAL LLCShared registered agent + mailing addressny_dos_corps 0.82
- Ultimate controllerA. ReyesDOS process address across 6 entitiesny_dos_corps 0.74
- Source
- nyc_acris
- Document type
- DEED
- Recorded
- 2019-04-11
- Grantor
- ESTATE OF M. OKONKWO
- Grantee
- VANDERPOOL HOLDINGS LLC
- Consideration
- $2,150,000
Every value on the left opens a record like this. Nothing is asserted without one.
The same inputs always produce the same answer
Two different things happen inside Mimir, and most vendors blur them. Identity follows fixed rules: the Rune Engine, our matching machine, turns county filings into one record per building and per person, and the same inputs give the same answer on every run. No machine learning. Who controls whom is a judgment, so it shows its evidence and a confidence score instead of hiding inside one number.
- One id per building and per owner, shared by every screen and every export
- Inferred links say they are inferred, with a score on each one
- Rebuildable from scratch, so any answer can be re-derived
A reviewer challenges one number. Watch it survive.
The same synthetic case that runs through this site, seen from the receipt.
- 01The challengeA committee member questions the $2,150,000 consideration on 441 Vanderpool St. In most shops this triggers an afternoon of re-research.
- 02Click the fieldThe value opens to its receipt: ACRIS 2019041100428001, source system, document type, recorded date, grantor, grantee, consideration.
- 03Pull it independentlyThe receipt names the county index and the document number. The reviewer can fetch the same instrument without asking us, which is the entire point.
- 04The chain, not just the fieldThe same expansion exists on every hop of the ownership chain and every line of the stack. Nothing on screen is more than one click from its paper.
- Where you landThe challenge dies in thirty seconds, in the meeting, without a research detour, and the reviewer now trusts every other number a little more.
- Owner of recordVANDERPOOL HOLDINGS LLCDeed recorded 2019-04-11nyc_acris
- Controlled byHARROW STREET CAPITAL LLCShared registered agent + mailing addressny_dos_corps 0.82
- Ultimate controllerA. ReyesDOS process address across 6 entitiesny_dos_corps 0.74
- Source
- nyc_acris
- Document type
- DEED
- Recorded
- 2019-04-11
- Grantor
- ESTATE OF M. OKONKWO
- Grantee
- VANDERPOOL HOLDINGS LLC
- Consideration
- $2,150,000
Every value on the left opens a record like this. Nothing is asserted without one.
Four things, on every field.
A source that only names a vendor is decoration. One that names the office, the document and the date is something a reviewer can go and pull themselves. That is the entire point.
- 01The source system
The government office and dataset it came from, named the way the office names it, so a reviewer knows exactly which index to open.
- 02The record id
The document number, so a reviewer can pull the same instrument from the same index without asking us.
- 03The recorded date
When the filing entered the public record, which is not the same as when we ingested it, and we never conflate the two.
- 04The confidence, when inferred
Facts read off a filing carry no score. Links we inferred carry one, on each link, visible.
Not “where did this come from?” but “can I pull it myself?”
Straight answers.
Is this the same as the sources page other vendors have?
No. A sources page says "our data comes from counties" once, for the whole site. Mimir puts the source on the number itself: this figure, from this document, for this building. Only the second survives an audit, because only the second can be pulled independently.
What about values you compute rather than read off a filing?
Derived values are labeled derived, with the inputs listed. An implied equity figure shows the value and debt lines it was computed from, each of which has its own receipt.
Do the sources survive export?
Yes. CSV exports carry the source and document id on every field. The dossier PDF prints them inline. If the sources fell off at export, the product would be decoration.
What does a confidence score mean on an inferred link?
It means we are showing you an inference and saying so. Facts read off filings carry no score. Links we inferred carry one on each step, with the evidence attached, so you can accept or reject each step on its merits.
Can the same answer be re-derived later?
Yes. The same inputs produce the same answer on every run, so a number from last quarter’s memo can be re-run and re-checked today. When new filings genuinely change the picture, the answer changes with them — it never pretends nothing happened.
How do you check that the ownership answers are right?
Random samples, hand-checked against the underlying documents by more than one reviewer, before a new answer type ships — a bar we call The Eye. And since every field shows its document, you can run the same check yourself on any answer.
See your market.
Twenty minutes on the live terminal.